Advocating Elderly Americans Essay -- Advocates Senior Citizens

The old in America have numerous necessities that can go from transportation, somewhat more cash, and even only a little friendship however one of their significant needs is promotion. They need somebody to fight with them for what the need. The older of today accomplished such a great deal for this nation such things as battle both universal wars and the Korean Conflict, they battled for uniformity, and the raised this nation to the significance we have today.      So what is a backer? Supporter is an individual or gathering that speaks to a typical intrigue and puts everything on the line to see that their motivation isn't disregarded. So for what reason does our older need advocates? Our older need advocates for different reasons. They need somebody to battle with congress over social insurance cost and issues, they need somebody to shield them against disregard and misuse, and above all else they need somebody to make them mindful of the administrations and projects accessible to make their lives simpler. Promoters are critical to our older just as they ought to be nobody needs to be distant from everyone else, we as a whole need somebody to battle close to us. So who does fight for our older?      In all pieces of the United States there are Offices for the Aging to help our older with getting the administrations they merit. The Office for the Aging was made to advance self-assurance, self-advancement and independence among the older. They additionally needed to make seniors mindful of the administrations accessible to them and their families. Throughout the years that Offices for the Aging has existed they have made systems of associations in numerous perspectives with in every one of their networks. Through their expansive scope of associations they can help any one with any issues. The vast majority feel as if the Office for the Aging is just a referral organization. There could be nothing further from reality, Office for the Aging offers a wide assortment of administrations yet in the event that they don't offer a help that you need they can and will allude you to an office that can. One of the administrations that the Office for the Aging offers is Social S ecurity advising. This is a major assistance due to the changing laws and the unpredictability of the laws it is extreme for some older to see appropriately get the entirety of the cash they are qualified for. Office for the Aging can likewise go to your Social Security hearing for you in the event that you wish that they do as such. The Office for ... ...as cited as saying, â€Å"It’s for all intents and purposes difficult to reclaim the House or win the administration without reclaiming the seniors. That makes them the key battleground†¦Ã¢â‚¬  In the up and coming decade there will be more than 76 million children of post war America that will be more than 65 that mean they will have more force then some other democratic associate in America. This implies the consideration that the senior vote is getting will get more grounded and more grounded. More established individuals are bound to cast a ballot that are more youthful individuals this implies seniors can be their own promoter. Seniors can be their own promoters by casting a ballot people into office that will cast a ballot their way on significant issues. Casting a ballot is an incredible instrument for all individuals however is regularly ignored.      Advocacy is a significant with the end goal for voices to be heard. Seniors residents have different necessities and as individual people it is our commitment to ensure them. They made ready for our country’s flourishing who are we to put them out field. Works Cited www.aarp.org www.americangeriatrics.org www.carie.org www.commoncause.org www.ncscinc.org www.senior.org The gerontologist. â€Å"Older People and Voting Participation: Past and Future† by Robert Binstock. February 2000.

Managerial Accounting Quiz 1 Essay Example for Free

Administrative Accounting Quiz 1 Essay Parts 1 and 2 10 Points 1. Complete the appropriate response sheet beneath by putting a X under each heading that distinguishes the cost in question. The Xs can be set under more than one heading for a solitary expense. (5 Points) Variable Cost Fixed Cost Direct Materials Direct Labor Manufactu ring Overhead Period Cost Materials costs X X Creation line laborers compensation X X Creation Equipment rental X X Processing plant Building devaluation X X Promoting costs X X 2. An incomplete posting of expenses brought about at Rust Corporation during August shows up underneath: Acquisition of crude materials†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ $ 135,000 Direct labor†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ 73,000 Manufacturing plant Utilities†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦. 11,000 Sales Commissions†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ 69,000 Administrative Salaries†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦.. 101,000 Indirect Labor†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ 89,000 Depreciation of Production Equipment†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦. 18,000 Indirect Materials†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ 10,000 Depreciation of Office Copy Machine†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦.. 5,000 Crude materials stock, beginning†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ 97,000 Crude materials stock, ending†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ 84,000 Work in process stock, beginning†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ 39,000 Work in process stock, ending†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ 52,000 Completed products stock, beginning†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ 106,000 Completed products stock, ending†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ 71,000 a. Set up a Schedule of Cost of Goods Manufactured in great structure. (3 Points) Direct Materials: Starting crude materials stock: $97,000 Include: Purchase of crude materials 135,000 Raw materials accessible for utilize 232,000 Deduct: Ending crude materials stock 84,000 Crude materials utilized underway $148,000 Direct Labor: 73,000 Assembling Overhead: 118,000 All out assembling cost: 339,000 Include: Beginning work in process stock 39,000 378,000 Deduct: Ending work in process stock 52,000 Cost of products fabricated $326,000 b. Figure the Cost of Goods Sold. (2 Points) Completed products stock, beginning$106,000 Include: Cost of products fabricated 326,000 Products ready to move 432,000 Deduct: Finished products stock, finishing 71,000 Cost of products sold $361,000 Administrative Acctg Quiz 2 †Fall 2012 NAME__ _______________________ Parts 3 and 4 10 Points 1. Pence Company is an assembling firm that utilizations work request costing. The organization applies overhead to employments utilizing a foreordained overhead rate dependent on machine-hours. Toward the start of the year, the organization evaluated that it would work 44,000 machine hours and would bring about $176,000 in assembling overhead expense. During the year the accompanying real expenses and hours were caused: Employment A Job B Job C Job D Direct Materials$ 135,000 $ 129,000 $ 98,000 $ 103,000 Direct Labor $ 80,000 $ 85,000 $ 63,000 $ 68,000 Machine Hours 12,000 13,000 8,000 14,000 Number of Units 50 35 60 Circuitous Materials utilized: $ 34,000 Aberrant Labor: $ 63,000 Selling Costs: $134,000 Manufacturing plant Utility Costs: $ 14,000 Manufacturing plant Depreciation: $114,000 Regulatory Salaries $157,000 Required: (5 focuses) a. Process the foreordained overhead rate 176000/44000= 4.00 b. Process the measure of overhead applied to each activity. A.12000*4= 48000 B. 13000*4= 52000 C. 8000*4= 32000 D. 14000*4= 56000 c. Expecting that Jobs A, B, and D were finished during the year, process the all out cost charged to each activity and the unit cost of the item created. A.5660 B.8543 D. 3983 d. Register the parity in Work In Process toward the year's end. 161,000 e. Register the measure of overhead under or overapplied. 176000-161000= 15000 f. Accepting the sum isn't material, compose the diary section required to close the assembling overhead record toward the year's end. Work in Process 161,000 Assembling Overhead161,000 2. Elton Company utilizes the weighted-normal strategy in its procedure costing framework. The organization includes materials toward the start of the procedure in Department M. Change costs were 75% finished concerning the 4,000 units in work in process at May 1 and half complete regarding the 6,000 units in work in process at May 31. During May, 12,000 units were finished and moved to the following division. An examination of the expenses identifying with work in process at May 1 and to creation action for May follows: Materials Transformation Work in process 5/1 $26,200 $19,370 Expenses included during May $26,900 $29,380 Required: Utilizing the weighted-normal technique, decide the Equivalent Units of Production for Materials and Conversion Costs, the Cost per Equivalent Unit for Material and Conversion Cost, and the all out item cost per Equivalent Unit. (5 Points) Equal units of creation Materials Conversion Transferred to next office.. 12,000 Ending work in process (materials: 6,000 units Ãâ€"100% complete; change: 6,000 units Ãâ€" half complete).. 6,000 3,000 Equivalent units of creation 18,000 15,000 Cost for each Equivalent Unit Materials Conversion Total Cost of starting work in process.. 26,200 19,370 Cost included during the period.. 26,900 29,380 Total cost (a) 53,100 48,750 Equivalent units of creation (b) 18,000 15,000 Cost for each proportionate unit, (a) à · (b). 2.95 3.25 Total: $6.20

A Few Lessons from FLL

A Few Lessons from FLL Spring is the season when students across the country are making choices: high school seniors are choosing where they are going to college (we just finished hosting Campus Preview Weekend to help our admitted students make their decision), high school juniors are choosing where they might want to apply to college, and high school freshmen and sophomores (and even my sixth grade daughter!) are choosing what classes to take next year. So this time of year I am asked all the time for advice on what choices students should make to help their chances of coming to MIT. As I recently wrote in an op-ed piece for the higher ed website Inside Higher Ed, the best thing a student can do is whatever will advance his or her personal growth and genuine enthusiasm for learning. In the piece I cite the FIRST robotics competition as one of many excellent and worthwhile activities a student might do. While many MIT students have participated in FIRST, last year I had the good fortune of experiencing FIRST through the eyes of my daughter, who was on a FIRST Lego League (FLL) team. And, as I am gearing up to head to St. Louis for the FIRST World Championships in a few days, I thought I would share a bit of my experience with the program. (Actually, my first experience with a FIRST-like program was in Woodie Flowers’ 2.70 design class at MIT â€" a story for another day.) The FLL program is the elementary and middle school version of the FIRST robotics competition. There are two elements to the program: a robotics competition and a project where the team identifies and develops a solution to a real world problem. Each year there is a theme to the robot game and the project. Last year’s theme, “Food Factor,” explored food safety and the challenge of keeping food from spoiling. But here is the key reason that I found FLL so valuable: the robot game and the project are overlaid with a third, arguably more important, element: the FLL Core Values. These core values, such as teamwork, discovery, and the notion that your competitors are really your collaborators, are the real insight into this program. Teams get evaluated based on how well they live these core values. You get judged not only on how many points your robot scores during the tournament and how good a solution you develop for the project, but also on your process â€" the teamwork, intentions, and values that you bring to it. How accepting was the group to different ideas? Did all members contribute? Were your mentors appropriately involved (i.e., guiding, but not doing)? And so the winning teams are not necessarily the ones that have the highest scoring robots or the most elegant designs (although these are good things). The process, intentions, attitudes, etc. â€" all the good stuff that allows teams to succeed and sets young people up for success in life â€" is what is judged and what is rewarded. As every engineer knows, you get what you measure, and as every parent knows, you get what you reward. The key is to measure and reward the outcomes you want. And FIRST is doing exactly that. Imagine if sports championships were won not only based on how many points you scored, but by how well your team worked together and solved problems, and how much you respected and even assisted your opponents? My daughter’s team learned an enormous amount about how to design and program a robot. They learned that by jumping in and trying things, you can learn to do something that just weeks before seemed impossibly hard. They learned how to build things that wouldn’t break (by building things that did), that it is actually good to change your direction once you realize it needs to change (by hanging on too long and then panicking), that getting ideas from others on the team actually didn’t mess everything up, and they learned to focus, ultimately building a robot that did a few tasks well rather then one that did many not so well. They also learned a lot about food safety. They learned that it is not so easy to keep food from spoiling. They learned to do research before identifying a problem to solve. They learned how to brainstorm possible solutions, and then compromise to agree on one to focus. And they learned that everyone had something unique they could contribute to the solution (including a team member who contributed his ventriloquism skills to the presentation!). What is clear is that the learning that takes place in FIRST is not abstract: it is real and accessible. Indeed, it is not only real, it is aligned with what we want student to learn. Programs like FIRST get students excited about working together, emphasizing that competition is more valuable when it is not about beating your opponent but when it is used to lift everyone up. This is exactly the type of experience our students need to be prepared to meet the challenges that the world faces.